Conducting Proper Peer Review for a Journal

Abstract

There is a historical context as well as a scientific approach to conducting a proper journal peer review. With the increasing number of manuscripts submitted by investigators, and the multitude of solicitations for articles by journals, the traffic and speed of peer-reviewed publications can overwhelm the scientific process of verifying the presented information. This treatise highlights the roles and rights of a journal expert peer reviewer, and offers a checklist for anyone reading through a journal before and after it has been published.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 10 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.