SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Patient self-report and medical records: measuring agreement for binary data.
13 references·0 citing·33 second hop
Patient self-report and medical records: measuring agreement for binary data. (2011)Patient self-report and medical records: …Measuring agreement of administrative data with chart data using prevalence unadjusted and adjusted kappa (2009)Measuring agreement of admini…Resolving the paradoxes (2008)Resolving the paradoxesThe Kappa Statistic in Reliability Studies: Use, Interpretation, and Sample Size Requirements (2005)The Kappa Statistic in Reliab…Beyond kappa: A review of interrater agreement measures (1999)Beyond kappa: A review of int…The dependence of kappa on attribute prevalence when assessing the repeatability of questionnaire data (1998)The dependence of kappa on at…Agreement between Medical Record Data and Patients' Accounts of Their Medical History and Treatment for Dyspepsia (1998)Agreement between Medical Rec…Behavior and interpretation of the κ statistic: Resolution of the two paradoxes (1996)Behavior and interpretation o…Bias, prevalence and kappa (1993)Bias, prevalence and kappaStatistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. (1992)Statistical methods for asses…High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes (1990)High agreement but low kappa:…High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes (1990)High agreement but low Kappa:…A rEAPPRAISAL OF THE KAPPA COEFFICIENT (1988)A rEAPPRAISAL OF THE KAPPA CO…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)MISINTERPRETATION AND MISUSE OF THE KAPPA STATISTIC (1987)Kappa coefficients in medical research (2002)Agreement between self-report questionnaires and medical record data was substantial for diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction and stroke but not for heart failure (2004)Measuring inter-rater reliability for nominal data – which coefficients and confidence intervals are appropriate? (2016)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies (1983)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses (1998)Reliability of the Modified Rankin Scale Across Multiple Raters (2005)On the reliability and validity of manual muscle testing: a literature review (2007)A Concordance Correlation Coefficient to Evaluate Reproducibility (1989)ASSESSING TEACHING PRESENCE IN A COMPUTER CONFERENCING CONTEXT (2001)Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education (2001)Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines (2020)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2010)Bias and prevalence effects on kappa viewed in terms of sensitivity and specificity (2000)Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study (2005)Fleiss’ kappa statistic without paradoxes (2014)Inter-Coder Agreement for Computational Linguistics (2008)Dealing with feeling: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. (2012)The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions (2013)Measurement of Observer Agreement (2003)A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples (2013)Method agreement analysis: A review of correct methodology (2010)Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–Fifth Edition (PCL-5) in veterans. (2015)New WHO prevalence estimates of mental disorders in conflict settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2019)A New Interpretation of the Weighted Kappa Coefficients (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 2005The Kappa Statistic in Reliability Studies: Use, Interpretation, and Sample Size Requirements4,093 cited
  • 1990High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes3,024 cited
  • 1993Bias, prevalence and kappa2,175 cited
  • 1990High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes1,836 cited
  • 1992Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures.988 cited
  • 1999Beyond kappa: A review of interrater agreement measures976 cited
  • 1988A rEAPPRAISAL OF THE KAPPA COEFFICIENT500 cited
  • 1996Behavior and interpretation of the κ statistic: Resolution of the two paradoxes311 cited
  • 2008Resolving the paradoxes224 cited
  • 2009Measuring agreement of administrative data with chart data using prevalence unadjusted and adjusted kappa183 cited
  • 1998Agreement between Medical Record Data and Patients' Accounts of Their Medical History and Treatment for Dyspepsia22 cited
  • 1998The dependence of kappa on attribute prevalence when assessing the repeatability of questionnaire data19 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work