Acceptance and perceived effectiveness of biometrics and other airport security procedures.

Ljudevit Pranić · Wesley S. Roehl · David B. West

5 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Technology Adoption and User Behaviour Biometric Identification and Security User Authentication and Security Systems

Abstract

Biometrics are automated methods of recognizing a person based on a physiological or behavioral characteristic – i.e., face, fingerprints, hand geometry, handwriting, iris, retinal, vein, and voice. Travelers are examined on their acceptance and perceived effectiveness of biometric technologies in airport security using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Additional analysis is performed separately to check for possible moderating effects of respondents’ gender, age, education, income, and flying frequency. Findings suggest that some travelers perceive biometric technologies as both acceptable and effective in making travel safer. The results of this study also show very few effects of gender, age, education, income, and flying frequency on biometrics’ acceptance and perceived effectiveness.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.