Transfusion‐transmitted human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) from seroconverting donors is rare in England and Wales: results from HIV lookback, October 1995 through December 2008

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lookback is considered when human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is detected in a repeat blood donor in case the immediately previous negative donation was donated in the infectious window period (IWP) or the assay(s) produced a false-negative result. HIV lookback investigations undertaken by NHS Blood and Transplant and the Welsh Blood Service between October 1995 and December 2008 are described. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Investigations were undertaken into the previous negative donations of 113 HIV-infected donors, including retrospective testing of archive samples, tracing of components, and identification of recipients who were offered HIV testing when appropriate. Data were collated on HIV seroconverters and outcome of the lookback was summarized. RESULTS: Two previous negative donations given before the introduction of minipool nucleic acid testing (MP-NAT) screening were confirmed positive by individual retrospective polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of the archive specimen. Red blood cell components had been transfused from both donations. One recipient died after transfusion, and the other was alive and tested HIV positive. All 23 (20%) donations previously testing negative by MP-NAT were confirmed to be PCR negative on individual testing of an archive specimen and none of the tested recipients of these donations had evidence of transfusion-transmitted HIV. CONCLUSION: The yield of lookback was low with one positive recipient identified over 13 years of surveillance: HIV transmission occurred from a window period donation given before the introduction of MP-NAT screening and would have been detected using current testing methods. Current residual risk estimates for the United Kingdom predict that HIV lookback will be of limited benefit, as demonstrated by our data.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 7 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.