SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Current State of Reporting Pain Outcomes in Cochrane Reviews of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions and Considerations for an OMERACT Research Agenda
14 references·0 citing·39 second hop
Current State of Reporting Pain Outcomes in Cochrane Reviews of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions and Considerations for an OMERACT Research Agenda (2015)Current State of Reporting Pain Outcomes …Patient‐reported outcomes (2019)Patient‐reported outcomesDeveloping Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0 (2014)Developing Core Outcome Measu…Updated Method Guidelines for Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group Systematic Reviews and Metaanalyses (2013)Updated Method Guidelines for…Is The Cochrane Collaboration Prepared for the Era of Patient-Centred Outcomes Research? (2013)Is The Cochrane Collaboration…GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles—continuous outcomes (2012)GRADE guidelines: 13. Prepari…GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables—binary outcomes (2012)GRADE guidelines: 12. Prepari…Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Developing core outcome sets …Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist (2011)Rating the methodological qua…The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)The COSMIN checklist for asse…Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research (2009)Initial National Priorities f…2009 Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group (2009)2009 Updated Method Guideline…Presenting Results and ‘Summary of Findings’ Tables (2008)Presenting Results and ‘Summa…Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)Three Approaches to Qualitati…Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Core outcome domains for chro…Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes (1995)The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes (2010)Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain (2015)A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery (2017)Developing a Set of Core Outcomes for Trials in Hemodialysis: An International Delphi Survey (2017)An Inventory for Measuring Depression (1961)The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. (1992)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Acceptance-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2011)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints (1998)Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis (2007)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder (2012)Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients (2015)Development of a Rating Scale for Primary Depressive Illness (1967)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods (2014)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)YOGA FOR DEPRESSION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS (2013)A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus (2014)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline (2016)The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument (2016)Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols (2018)Qualitative research and evaluation methods (1980)Naturalistic inquiry (1985)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)The qualitative content analysis process (2008)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research (2013)Akufo and Ibarapa (1965)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires (2006)Computer-Delivered and Web-Based Interventions to Improve Depression, Anxiety, and Psychological Well-Being of University Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2014)Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults (2016)COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis44,511 cited
  • 2010The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study4,259 cited
  • 2003Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations3,496 cited
  • 2011Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist1,977 cited
  • 20092009 Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group1,663 cited
  • 2012Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider1,659 cited
  • 2012GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables—binary outcomes836 cited
  • 2014Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0781 cited
  • 2012GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles—continuous outcomes771 cited
  • 2008Presenting Results and ‘Summary of Findings’ Tables206 cited
  • 2009Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research174 cited
  • 2013Updated Method Guidelines for Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group Systematic Reviews and Metaanalyses151 cited
  • 2019Patient‐reported outcomes146 cited
  • 2013Is The Cochrane Collaboration Prepared for the Era of Patient-Centred Outcomes Research?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

19 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.