Why with bibliometrics the Humanities does not need to be the weakest linkA. J. M. Linmans2009-08-12articleScientometrics97 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.scientometrics and bibliometrics researchPsychology Research and BibliometricsWeb visibility and informetricsAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 97 citations exist upstream.References2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output2005Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation2006Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review1965The Two Cultures: And a Second Look2006Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases1970Communication among scientists and engineers2001Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance2006The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanitiesCited by2010Interdisciplinarity and the intellectual base of literature studies: citation analysis of highly cited monographs2011The structure of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: A mapping on the basis of aggregated citations among 1,157 journals2016Beyond Coverage: Toward a Bibliometrics for the Humanities2015Can A mazon.com reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books?2013Coverage, field specialisation and the impact of scientific publishers indexed in the Book Citation Index2012Prescribed practices of authorship: review of codes of ethics from professional bodies and journal guidelines across disciplines2013Analyzing the citation characteristics of books: edited books, book series and publisher types in the book citation index2015Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 3: books and non standard outputs