Reviewdiamond2015

What to Do When Everyone Wants You to Collaborate: Managing the Demand for Library Support in Systematic Review Searching

12 citations0/0 files storedJournal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l Association de bilbiothèques de la santé du Canada

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Library Science and Information Literacy Library Science and Information

Abstract

The demand for systematic review support in academic health sciences libraries is increasing. To manage the demand, the John W. Scott Health Sciences Library at the University of Alberta has created an action plan consisting of eight strategies. The results of implementing these strategies have been varied. Some have shown immediate results, while others are long term strategies.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 12 citations exist upstream.

References

2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies 2020Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 2006Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide 2010Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews 2005Systematic reviews need systematic searchers.2005The librarian's roles in the systematic review process: a case study.

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.