SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Optimal strategies to consider when peer reviewing a systematic review and meta-analysis
16 references·3 citing·22 second hopsampled
Optimal strategies to consider when peer reviewing a systematic review and meta-analysis (2015)Optimal strategies to consider when peer …Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data (2015)Preferred Reporting Items for…Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Reducing waste from incomplet…RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses (2013)RAMESES publication standards…The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews (2012)The nuts and bolts of PROSPER…Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials (2012)Influence of Reported Study D…Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ (2012)Enhancing transparency in rep…The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010)The impact of outcome reporti…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies (2009)An evidence-based practice gu…Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…Peer Review Guidance for Evaluating the Narrative Review: Lessons Applied From the Systematic Review (2021)Peer Review Guidance for Eval…Assessing abstracts of Iranian systematic reviews and meta-analysis indexed in WOS and Scopus using PRISMA (2017)Assessing abstracts of Irania…Peer review: tips from field experts for junior reviewers (2015)Peer review: tips from field …The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Accuracy of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening to detect major depression: individual participant data meta-analysis (2019)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses (2018)Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. (2018)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,549 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,189 cited
  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement19,577 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation13,108 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration10,345 cited
  • 2012Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ3,561 cited
  • 2015Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data2,123 cited
  • 2012The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews1,430 cited
  • 2013RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses1,374 cited
  • 2014Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1,315 cited
  • 2010The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews1,133 cited
  • 2012Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials1,047 cited
  • 2009An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies607 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2017Assessing abstracts of Iranian systematic reviews and meta-analysis indexed in WOS and Scopus using PRISMA14 cited
    • 2021Peer Review Guidance for Evaluating the Narrative Review: Lessons Applied From the Systematic Review12 cited
    • 2015Peer review: tips from field experts for junior reviewers11 cited