SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The explicit mentioning of reporting guidelines in urogynecology journals in 2013: A bibliometric study
13 references·1 citing·48 second hop
The explicit mentioning of reporting guidelines in urogynecology journals in 2013: A bibliometric study (2015)The explicit mentioning of reporting guid…The Quality of Methods Reporting in Parasitology Experiments (2014)The Quality of Methods Report…Does the CONSORT checklist for abstracts improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials on clinical pathways? (2014)Does the CONSORT checklist fo…Compliance with STARD Checklist among Studies of Coronary CT Angiography: Systematic Review (2014)Compliance with STARD Checkli…Adherence to reporting guidelines in observational studies concerning exposure to persistent organic pollutants and effects on semen parameters (2014)Adherence to reporting guidel…Adherence to CONSORT Adverse Event Reporting Guidelines in Randomized Clinical Trials Evaluating Systemic Cancer Therapy: A Systematic Review (2013)Adherence to CONSORT Adverse …Adherence of Randomized Trials Within Children's Surgical Specialties Published During 2000 to 2009 to Standard Reporting Guidelines (2013)Adherence of Randomized Trial…Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa (2012)Does use of the CONSORT State…The quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in pelvic organ prolapse (2011)The quality of reporting of r…Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial (2011)Effect of using reporting gui…Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network (2010)Transparent and accurate repo…The EQUATOR Network and reporting guidelines: Helping to achieve high standards in reporting health research studies (2009)The EQUATOR Network and repor…Responsible reporting of health research studies: transparent, complete, accurate and timely (2009)Responsible reporting of heal…Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research (2008)Helping editors, peer reviewe…CONSORT and the internal validity of randomized controlled trials in Female Pelvic Medicine (2015)CONSORT and the internal vali…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Publication guidelines need widespread adoption (2011)Development of the Standards of Reporting of Neurological Disorders (STROND) checklist (2015)Consolidated Reporting Guidelines for Prognostic and Diagnostic Machine Learning Modeling Studies: Development and Validation (2023)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Primary outcomes reporting in trials of paediatric type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review (2017)Enrollment and reporting practices in pediatric general surgical randomized clinical trials: A systematic review and observational analysis (2018)Adherence to the CONSORT statement and extension for nonpharmacological treatments in randomized controlled trials of bariatric surgery: A systematic survey (2021)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Poor patient-reported outcomes reporting according to CONSORT guidelines in randomized clinical trials evaluating systemic cancer therapy (2014)Reporting guidelines for oncology research: helping to maximise the impact of your research (2018)Reporting of Late Morbidity After Radiation Therapy in Large Prospective Studies: A Descriptive Review of the Current Status (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Evaluating the impact and use of Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomised Designs (TREND) reporting guidelines (2012)Survey of the Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews in Rehabilitation (2013)Professional medical writing support and the quality of randomised controlled trial reporting: a cross-sectional study (2016)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts published in leading laser medicine journals: an assessment using the CONSORT for abstracts guidelines (2016)Structure formats of randomised controlled trial abstracts: a cross-sectional analysis of their current usage and association with methodology reporting (2018)Assessing the Quality of Abstracts in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High Impact Cardiovascular Journals (2019)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)The MAPS Reporting Statement for Studies Mapping onto Generic Preference-Based Outcome Measures: Explanation and Elaboration (2015)Reporting of method comparison studies: a review of advice, an assessment of current practice, and specific suggestions for future reports (2016)PRIRATE 2020 guidelines for reporting randomized trials in Endodontics: a consensus‐based development (2020)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Establishing a new journal for systematic review products (2012)Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review (2014)Strengthening the Reporting of Molecular Epidemiology for Infectious Diseases (STROME-ID): an extension of the STROBE statement (2014)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Reporting scoping reviews—PRISMA ScR extension (2020)A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021)A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas (2022)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an Intervention Mapping approach (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa628 cited
  • 2010Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network589 cited
  • 2011Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial291 cited
  • 2008Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research153 cited
  • 2013Adherence to CONSORT Adverse Event Reporting Guidelines in Randomized Clinical Trials Evaluating Systemic Cancer Therapy: A Systematic Review125 cited
  • 2009The EQUATOR Network and reporting guidelines: Helping to achieve high standards in reporting health research studies97 cited
  • 2009Responsible reporting of health research studies: transparent, complete, accurate and timely43 cited
  • 2014Does the CONSORT checklist for abstracts improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials on clinical pathways?27 cited
  • 2014The Quality of Methods Reporting in Parasitology Experiments20 cited
  • 2013Adherence of Randomized Trials Within Children's Surgical Specialties Published During 2000 to 2009 to Standard Reporting Guidelines15 cited
  • 2014Compliance with STARD Checklist among Studies of Coronary CT Angiography: Systematic Review13 cited
  • 2011The quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in pelvic organ prolapse

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

12 cited
  • 2014Adherence to reporting guidelines in observational studies concerning exposure to persistent organic pollutants and effects on semen parameters11 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2015CONSORT and the internal validity of randomized controlled trials in Female Pelvic Medicine7 cited