SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Comparison of bitemarks left in foodstuffs with models of the suspects' dentitions as a means of identifying a perpetrator.
0 references·6 citing·21 second hop
Comparison of bitemarks left in foodstuffs with models of the suspects' dentitions as a means of identifying a perpetrator. (2000)Comparison of bitemarks left in foodstuff…A systematic review of 3D scanners and computer assisted analyzes of bite marks: searching for improved analysis methods during the Covid-19 pandemic (2021)A systematic review of 3D sca…Tri-dimensional pattern analysis of foodstuff bitemarks — A pilot study of tomographic database (2018)Tri-dimensional pattern analy…Bite Mark Analysis in Foodstuffs and Inanimate Objects and the Underlying Proofs for Validity and Judicial Acceptance (2017)Bite Mark Analysis in Foodstu…Three-dimensional validation of the impact of the quantity of teeth or tooth parts on the morphological difference between twin dentitions. (2016)Three-dimensional validation …Bite Marks as Physical Evidence from the Crime Scene-An Overview (2013)Bite Marks as Physical Eviden…A comparative study of overlay generation methods in bite mark analysis (2013)A comparative study of overla…BITE MARKS IN FORENSIC DENTISTRY: A REVIEW OF LEGAL, SCIENTIFIC ISSUES (1995)Accuracy of Bite Mark Overlays: A Comparison of Five Common Methods to Produce Exemplars from a Suspect's Dentition (1998)Dental anomalies and their value in human identification: a case report. (2010)Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Science (1977)Criminal Profiling: An Introduction to Behavioral Evidence Analysis (1999)Criminal Profiling: An Introduction to Behavioral Evidence Analysis (2000)Computer–based method of bite mark analysis: A benchmark in forensic dentistry? (2016)Statistical Evidence for the Individuality of the Human Dentition (1984)A look at forensic dentistry – Part 2: Teeth as weapons of violence – identification of bitemark perpetrators (2001)Feasibility and validation of virtual autopsy for dental identification using the Interpol dental codes (2012)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (2010)Exploring the degrees of distortion in simulated human bite marks (2019)The scientific basis for human bitemark analyses – a critical review (2001)Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The pandemic paradox: The consequences of COVID‐19 on domestic violence (2020)Digital intraoral and radiologic records in forensic identification: Match with disruptive technology (2024)Forensic Odontology in the Digital Era: A Narrative Review of Current Methods and Emerging Trends (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2021A systematic review of 3D scanners and computer assisted analyzes of bite marks: searching for improved analysis methods during the Covid-19 pandemic22 cited
  • 2017Bite Mark Analysis in Foodstuffs and Inanimate Objects and the Underlying Proofs for Validity and Judicial Acceptance21 cited
  • 2013A comparative study of overlay generation methods in bite mark analysis15 cited
  • 2013Bite Marks as Physical Evidence from the Crime Scene-An Overview12 cited
  • 2016Three-dimensional validation of the impact of the quantity of teeth or tooth parts on the morphological difference between twin dentitions.12 cited
  • 2018Tri-dimensional pattern analysis of foodstuff bitemarks — A pilot study of tomographic database12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work