SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Selbststeuerung der Wissenschaft: Peer Review
11 references·2 citing·32 second hop
Selbststeuerung der Wissenschaft: Peer Review (2010)Selbststeuerung der Wissenschaft: Peer Re…Die Wissenschaft der Öffentlichkeit (2011)Die Wissenschaft der Öffentli…Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability. (2008)Improving the peer-review pro…Wissenschaftliche Produktionsgemeinschaften: die soziale ordnung der forschung [Scientific Production Communities. The Social Order of Research] (2006)Wissenschaftliche Produktions…The policy challenges of peer review: managing bias, conflict of interests and interdisciplinary assessments (2006)The policy challenges of peer…‘New Public Management’ and the Academic Profession: Reflections on the German Situation (2005)‘New Public Management’ and t…Peer Review Verfahren auf dem Prüfstand / Peer Review Research – Reviewed (2004)Peer Review Verfahren auf dem…Editorial peer review (2001)Editorial peer reviewThe Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory (2000)The Republic of Science: Its …Wissenschaftsindikatoren : Bewertungen in der Wissenschaft (1997)Wissenschaftsindikatoren : Be…Peer Review Revisited (1975)Peer Review RevisitedThe Republic of science (1962)The Republic of sciencePraxishandbuch Open Access (2017)Praxishandbuch Open AccessCan evaluation contribute to the organizational development of academic institutions? An international comparison (2013)Can evaluation contribute to …Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science (1988)Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication (2008)Peer review of grant applications in biology and medicine. Reliability, fairness, and validity (2009)Criteria for assessing grant applications: a systematic review (2020)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches (2009)The Roles of Creativity in Society (2010)Gender differences in grant and personnel award funding rates at the Canadian Institutes of Health Research based on research content area: A retrospective analysis (2019)Co-authorship trends and collaboration patterns in the Slovenian sociological community (2010)Fashion in Organization Theory: An Empirical Analysis of the Diffusion of Theoretical Concepts (2011)Making Science News: The Press Relations of Scientific Journals and Implications for Scholarly Communication (2011)Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination (1992)Why We Disagree about Climate Change (2009)Developing a framework for responsible innovation (2013)GOVERNMENT CONTINUES TO DO ITS JOB. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF GOVERNANCE SHIFTS IN THE HIGHER EDUCATION SECTOR (2011)The Academic Manifesto: From an Occupied to a Public University (2015)Nested Organizational Fields: Isomorphism and Differentiation among European Universities (2016)A physics editor comments on Peters and Ceci's peer-review study (1982)Peer review: A philosophically faulty concept which is proving disastrous for science (1982)Publication, politics, and scientific progress (1982)‘Interdisciplinary strategies’ in U.S. research universities (2007)Conservatism and risk-taking in peer review: Emerging ERC practices (2012)Collaboration, interdisciplinarity, and the epistemology of contemporary science (2015)A Framework for Responsible Innovation (2013)Evaluation Without Evaluators (2007)The Social Orders of Research Evaluation Systems (2007)A new bibliometric approach to measure knowledge transfer of internationally mobile scientists (2018)Archives of scientific psychology: A new journal for a new era. (2013)How peer-review constrains cognition: on the frontline in the knowledge sector (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1962The Republic of science1,000 cited
  • 2000The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory627 cited
  • 2008Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability.299 cited
  • 2005‘New Public Management’ and the Academic Profession: Reflections on the German Situation256 cited
  • 2006The policy challenges of peer review: managing bias, conflict of interests and interdisciplinary assessments179 cited
  • 2004Peer Review Verfahren auf dem Prüfstand / Peer Review Research – Reviewed84 cited
  • 1975Peer Review Revisited70 cited
  • 1997Wissenschaftsindikatoren : Bewertungen in der Wissenschaft54 cited
  • 2006Wissenschaftliche Produktionsgemeinschaften: die soziale ordnung der forschung [Scientific Production Communities. The Social Order of Research]52 cited
  • 2001Editorial peer review47 cited
  • 2011Die Wissenschaft der Öffentlichkeit41 cited

Cited by

  • 2017Praxishandbuch Open Access18 cited
  • 2013Can evaluation contribute to the organizational development of academic institutions? An international comparison15 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work