Whatever happened to abstracts from different sections of the association for research in vision and ophthalmology?

Mark S. Juzych · Lydia A. Juzych

52 citations0/0 files storedPubMed

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic Writing and Publishing Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

PURPOSE: The authors investigated the fate of abstracts from each ARVO section (May 1985 meeting), the overall publication percentage, and the journals in which the abstract-derived articles were published. METHODS: They performed a MEDLINE search by first author for 25 or 26 randomly selected abstracts from each section to identify those that led to full-length articles in peer-reviewed journals. RESULTS: Overall, 63% of abstracts led to full-length articles in peer-reviewed journals within our search period of 87 months. The publication rate of oral presentation abstracts (68%) was significantly higher than that of poster presentation abstracts (56%). A greater proportion of basic science-oriented abstracts (67%) led to publication than the clinically oriented abstracts (56%). The rate of publication was lowest for the Cornea section (40%) and highest for Physiology and Pharmacology (80%) and Biochemistry (76%). The abstract-derived articles were published in 67 different peer-reviewed journals, with 43% of the articles appearing in only five journals. CONCLUSIONS: The fact that the majority of abstracts led to full-length articles supports ARVO's goal of a large interdisciplinary appeal with the exchange of ideas among different investigators.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 52 citations exist upstream.

References

1980Fate of Cardiology Research Originally Published in Abstract Form

Cited by

2007Publication Bias in Abstracts Presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2004Factors Influencing the Publication of Randomized Controlled Trials in Child Health Research 2006Scientific papers presented at the 2000–2001 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) meetings: publication rates during the period 2000–2004 2005Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts 2009The Publication Rate of Abstracts Presented at the 2003 Urological Brazilian Meeting 2001Publication Rate of Abstracts Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery 1998Scientific meeting abstracts: significance, access, and trends.2006PUBLICATION BIAS IN PAPERS PRESENTED TO THE AUSTRALIAN ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATION ANNUAL SCIENTIFIC MEETING

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.