SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Expert Expert Witness: More Maxims and Guidelines for Testifying in Court
0 references·9 citing·39 second hop
The Expert Expert Witness: More Maxims and Guidelines for Testifying in Court (1999)The Expert Expert Witness: More Maxims an…Civil Forensic Evaluation in Psychological Injury and Law: Legal, Professional, and Ethical Considerations (2020)Civil Forensic Evaluation in …The 4 Ds of Forensic Mental Health Assessments of Personal Injury (2016)The 4 Ds of Forensic Mental H…Differences in expert witness knowledge: do mock jurors notice and does it matter? (2015)Differences in expert witness…Attorney beliefs concerning scientific evidence and expert witness credibility (2015)Attorney beliefs concerning s…“Hired guns,” “charlatans,” and their “voodoo psychobabble”: Case law references to various forms of perceived bias among mental health expert witnesses. (2012)“Hired guns,” “charlatans,” a…Psychologists as witnesses: background and good practice in the delivery of evidence (2008)Psychologists as witnesses: b…On Being an Expert Witness: It's not about you (2008)On Being an Expert Witness: I…Undue Influence or Ensuring Rights?: Attorney Presence During Forensic Psychology Evaluations (2007)Undue Influence or Ensuring R…Believability of expert and lay witnesses: Implications for trial consultation. (2002)Believability of expert and l…Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. (1992)“Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct” (2000)Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. (2002)The Bias Blind Spot: Perceptions of Bias in Self Versus Others (2002)Strengthening forensic science in the United States : a path forward (2009)Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009)Linguistic Evidence: Language, Power, and Strategy in the Courtroom (1982)Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists. (1991)Admitting scientific expert evidence in the UK: reliability challenges and the need for revised criteria – proposing an Abridged Daubert (2015)Sherlock Holmes and the Case of Resist/Refuse Dynamics: Confirmatory Bias and Abductive Inference in Child Custody Evaluations (2020)The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. (2021)On the witness stand: Essays in psychology and crime. (1915)Forensic psychological expertise in the wake of Daubert. (1997)Whores of the Court: The Fraud of Psychiatric Testimony and the Rape of American Justice (1997)Behavioral sciences and the law. (1966)The effects of clinical and scientific expert testimony on juror decision making in capital sentencing. (2001)Does interrater (dis)agreement on Psychopathy Checklist scores in sexually violent predator trials suggest partisan allegiance in forensic evaluations? (2007)Expert Witness Credibility as a Function of Eye Contact Behavior and Gender (2008)Self-efficacy and confidence: Theoretical distinctions and implications for trial consultation. (2009)Testifying in court: Guidelines and maxims for the expert witness. (2022)What is beautiful is good. (1972)Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. (1980)Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. (2000)Women as Expert Witnesses: A Review of the Literature (2014)Accusers Lie and Other Myths: Rape Myth Acceptance Predicts Judgments Made About Accusers and Accused Perpetrators in a Rape Case (2018)Rix's Expert Psychiatric Evidence (2020)The effects of peer review and evidence quality on judge evaluations of psychological science: Are judges effective gatekeepers? (2000)Asking the gatekeepers: A national survey of judges on judging expert evidence in a post-Daubert world. (2001)Educator of the court: the role of the expert witness in cases involving autism spectrum disorder (2017)Taking forensic mental health assessment “out of the lab” and into “the real world”: Introduction to the special issue on the field utility of forensic assessment instruments and procedures. (2017)Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2013)Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2013)Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. (2014)Forensic Evaluation in Civil Litigation (2023)The American Psychological Association (1919)MMPI-2 : Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 : manual for administration and scoring (1989)Evaluation Decisions by Psychologists about Causation and Damages in Personal Injury and Employment Discrimination Cases (2024)Ethical and Professional Considerations in Forensic Neuropsychology (2025)One hundred and ten fundamentals of performance validity tests in neuropsychological forensic disability and related assessment III: Core sources (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2015Differences in expert witness knowledge: do mock jurors notice and does it matter?44 cited
  • 2002Believability of expert and lay witnesses: Implications for trial consultation.39 cited
  • 2012“Hired guns,” “charlatans,” and their “voodoo psychobabble”: Case law references to various forms of perceived bias among mental health expert witnesses.31 cited
  • 2020Civil Forensic Evaluation in Psychological Injury and Law: Legal, Professional, and Ethical Considerations23 cited
  • 2008On Being an Expert Witness: It's not about you17 cited
  • 2016The 4 Ds of Forensic Mental Health Assessments of Personal Injury12 cited
  • 2008Psychologists as witnesses: background and good practice in the delivery of evidence10 cited
  • 2015Attorney beliefs concerning scientific evidence and expert witness credibility10 cited
  • 2007Undue Influence or Ensuring Rights?: Attorney Presence During Forensic Psychology Evaluations5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work