The Arbitration of Grievances of Police Officers and Fire Fighters

Helen LaVan · Marsha Katz · Cameron Carley

3 citations0/0 files storedPublic Personnel Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Labor Movements and Unions Dispute Resolution and Class Actions Legal and Labor Studies

Abstract

This is a study of 259 arbitrated grievances of police and fire fighters. The results indicate that salary cases were not as frequent as was expected, but work assignment cases were more frequent than expected. Unions which were not predominantly public sector unions represented police and fire fighters in a different way on issues of performance appraisal than did unions which were predominantly public sector unions. The existence of multiple grievants or issues of off-the-job behavior had impacts on other case characteristics or case outcomes.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 3 citations exist upstream.

References

1989Collective Bargaining Laws, Threat Effects, and the Determination of Police Compensation 1986Collective Bargaining, Interest Arbitration, and Police Salaries 1988Wages, Nonwage Compensation, and Municipal Unions 1985Police bargaining, arbitration, and fringe benefits 1990ARBITRATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: A CURRENT PERSPECTIVE 1988Pay for Time Not Worked: A Public-Sector Budget Dilemma 1988Interest Arbitrators and Their Decision Behavior 1985Collective Bargaining, Interest Arbitration, and the Delivery of Police Services

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.