Who best represents the interests of the child in court?

John P. Poertner

28 citations0/0 files storedPubMed

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Child Welfare and Adoption Legal and Social Justice Studies Children's Rights and Participation

Abstract

Representation of children in judicial proceedings is a matter of public policy, but it is not funded. Court-appointed special advocates (CASA) are a low-cost way of providing this representation. The study reported here compares a CASA program to a staff attorney model, and reveals CASA's assets.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 28 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

1999The Effectiveness of Court Appointed Special Advocates to Assist in Permanency Planning 2003The Court-Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) Program: Bringing Information to Child Abuse & Neglect Cases 2013Establishing CASA as an Evidence-Based Practice 2004Effectiveness of citizen review panels 2018Child welfare system interventions on behalf of children and families: Highlighting the role of court appointed special advocates

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.