References

• 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
• 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
• 2013Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience7,634 cited
• 2001Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis3,777 cited
• 2010Robust variance estimation in meta‐regression with dependent effect size estimates2,081 cited
• 1994Handbook of pain assessment1,991 cited
• 2005Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results1,567 cited
• 1999Meta-analysis: formulating, evaluating, combining, and reporting994 cited
• 2002Meta‐Analysis Of Controlled Clinical Trials826 cited
• 2010Small study effects in meta-analyses of osteoarthritis trials: meta-epidemiological study559 cited
• 2002Individual patient‐ versus group‐level data meta‐regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head469 cited
• 2011Single-Center Trials Show Larger Treatment Effects Than Multicenter Trials: Evidence From a Meta-epidemiologic Study305 cited
• 2002Meta‐analysis combining parallel and cross‐over clinical trials. I: Continuous outcomes208 cited
• 2012Impact of single centre status on estimates of intervention effects in trials with continuous outcomes: meta-epidemiological study