SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Findings from a novel approach to publication guideline revision: user road testing of a draft version of SQUIRE 2.0
16 references·0 citing·34 second hop
Findings from a novel approach to publication guideline revision: user road testing of a draft version of SQUIRE 2.0 (2015)Findings from a novel approach to publica…Guidelines for reporting health research a user's manual (2014)Guidelines for reporting heal…Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Better reporting of intervent…Impact of STROBE Statement Publication on Quality of Observational Study Reporting: Interrupted Time Series versus Before-After Analysis (2013)Impact of STROBE Statement Pu…Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Guidance for Developers of He…CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updat…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…Quality of Reporting in Randomized Trials Published in High-Quality Surgical Journals (2009)Quality of Reporting in Rando…Quality of reporting Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: Application of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) (2008)Quality of reporting Randomiz…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Does the CONSORT checklist im…Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in the intensive care literature (2002)Quality of reporting of rando…Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials (2001)Use of the CONSORT Statement …A new structure for quality improvement reports. (1999)A new structure for quality i…Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. (1984)Content Analysis: An Introduc…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals (2012)COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (2021)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Psychological Distress in Refugee Children: A Systematic Review (2010)The Influence of the Therapist-Patient Relationship on Treatment Outcome in Physical Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review (2010)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document (2017)Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness (2003)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)The qualitative content analysis process (2008)Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies (2014)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT): Explanation and Elaboration Statement (2016)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1984Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology.24,312 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies22,917 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies17,756 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2014Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide10,521 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement1,987 cited
  • 2010Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines1,432 cited
  • 2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,019 cited
  • 2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited
  • 2014Guidelines for reporting health research a user's manual118 cited
  • 2013Impact of STROBE Statement Publication on Quality of Observational Study Reporting: Interrupted Time Series versus Before-After Analysis101 cited
  • 2009Quality of Reporting in Randomized Trials Published in High-Quality Surgical Journals

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

79 cited
  • 2008Quality of reporting Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: Application of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT)67 cited
  • 1999A new structure for quality improvement reports.62 cited
  • 2002Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in the intensive care literature48 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.