SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Error and Inference
0 references·16 citing·54 second hop
Error and Inference (2009)Error and InferencePhilosophers on drugs (2017)Philosophers on drugsCausal theories, models and evidence in economics—some reflections from the natural sciences (2017)Causal theories, models and e…Model-Selection Theory: The Need for a More Nuanced Picture of Use-Novelty and Double-Counting (2016)Model-Selection Theory: The N…Can we trust Big Data? Applying philosophy of science to software (2016)Can we trust Big Data? Applyi…Philosophy of Climate Science Part II: Modelling Climate Change (2015)Philosophy of Climate Science…Error statistical modeling and inference: Where methodology meets ontology (2015)Error statistical modeling an…What's Wrong With Our Theories of Evidence? (2014)What's Wrong With Our Theorie…Values and Decisions (2014)Values and DecisionsUnderdetermination and decomposition in Kepler's Astronomia Nova (2014)Underdetermination and decomp…Seeing the wood for the trees: philosophical aspects of classical, Bayesian and likelihood approaches in statistical inference and some implications for phylogenetic analysis (2014)Seeing the wood for the trees…The phylogeography debate and the epistemology of model-based evolutionary biology (2013)The phylogeography debate and…State of the Field: Why novel prediction matters (2013)State of the Field: Why novel…Climate Models, Calibration, and Confirmation (2013)Climate Models, Calibration, …Popper and Hypothetico-deductivism (2011)Popper and Hypothetico-deduct…The Discovery of Argon: A Case for Learning from Data? (2010)The Discovery of Argon: A Cas…Is Frequentist Testing Vulnerable to the Base-Rate Fallacy? (2010)Is Frequentist Testing Vulner…The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Representing and Intervening (1983)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2002)Experiment and theory building (2010)A frequentist interpretation of probability for model-based inductive inference (2011)The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1959)The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1959)CONJECTURES AND REFUTATIONS (1963)Hempel and the Paradoxes of Confirmation (2011)Evidence amalgamation, plausibility, and cancer research (2017)How Bayesian Rationality Fails and Critical Rationality Works (2017)Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences (1994)Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming (2011)A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways (2013)When portfolio theory can help environmental investment planning to reduce climate risk to future environmental outcomes—and when it cannot (2018)Epistemic and Objective Possibility in Science (2021)Understanding data uncertainty (2025)Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (1976)The Essential Tension (1977)Inference to the Best Explanation (2003)What’s so bad about scientism? (2017)How institutional theories explain and fail to explain organizations (2020)A framework for enhancing the replicability of behavioral MIS research using prediction oriented techniques (2024)Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach (1990)Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge (1996)SCIENCE IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY (2011)Meeting our standards for educational justice: Doing our best with the evidence (2018)What are the drivers of induction? Towards a Material Theory+ (2020)How to Tell When Simpler, More Unified, or LessAd HocTheories will Provide More Accurate Predictions (1994)Prediction Versus Accommodation and the Risk of Overfitting (2004)Error and inference: recent exchanges on experimental reasoning, reliability, and the objectivity and rationality of science (2010)Computer simulations and experiments: The case of the Higgs boson (2015)Predictivism and old evidence: a critical look at climate model tuning (2015)Theoretical Virtues in Science: Uncovering Reality through Theory (2018)Design of Experiments (1936)Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (1982)The earth is round (p < .05). (1994)Learning From Testimony on Quantitative Research in Management (2019)CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK* (1964)The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets (1965)THE VALUATION OF RISK ASSETS AND THE SELECTION OF RISKY INVESTMENTS IN STOCK PORTFOLIOS AND CAPITAL BUDGETS**This paper is another in a series of interrelated theoretical and statistical studies of corporate financial and investment policies being made under grants from the Rockefeller Foundation, and more recently the Ford Foundation, to the Harvard Business School. The generous support for this work is most gratefully acknowledged. The author is also much indebted to his colleagues Professors Bishop, Christenson, Kahr, Raiffa, and (especially) Schlaifer, for extensive discussion and commentary on an earlier draft of this paper; but responsibility for any errors or imperfections remains strictly his own.[Professor Sharpe's paper, “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk” (Journal of Finance, September 1964) appeared after this paper was in final form and on its way to the printers. My first section, which parallels the first half of his paper (with corresponding conclusions), sets the algebraic framework for sections II, III and VI, (which have no counterpart in his paper) and for section IV on the equilibrium prices of risk assets, concerning which our results differ significantly for reasons which will be explored elsewhere. Sharpe does not take up the capital budgeting problem developed in section V below.] (1975)Lack of theory building and testing impedes progress in the factor and network literature (2020)Why Experimental Balance Is Still a Reason to Randomize (2021)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA (2012)Data Governance as Success Factor for Data Science (2020)From Digital Government to Digital Governance: Are We There Yet? (2020)What kind of trust does AI deserve, if any? (2022)Science as Social Knowledge (1990)Knowledge in a Social World (1999)Evidence-based Policy (2006)Evaluating the quality of medical evidence in real‐world contexts (2018)In defense of meta-analysis (2018)Evidence-based Medicine and Mechanistic Evidence: The Case of the Failed Rollout of Efavirenz in Zimbabwe (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2016Can we trust Big Data? Applying philosophy of science to software69 cited
  • 2015Philosophy of Climate Science Part II: Modelling Climate Change59 cited
  • 2013Climate Models, Calibration, and Confirmation58 cited
  • 2013State of the Field: Why novel prediction matters51 cited
  • 2010Is Frequentist Testing Vulnerable to the Base-Rate Fallacy?46 cited
  • 2015Error statistical modeling and inference: Where methodology meets ontology42 cited
  • 2017Philosophers on drugs39 cited
  • 2014What's Wrong With Our Theories of Evidence?28 cited
  • 2011Popper and Hypothetico-deductivism27 cited
  • 2010The Discovery of Argon: A Case for Learning from Data?25 cited
  • 2017Causal theories, models and evidence in economics—some reflections from the natural sciences21 cited
  • 2014Values and Decisions20 cited
  • 2016Model-Selection Theory: The Need for a More Nuanced Picture of Use-Novelty and Double-Counting16 cited
  • 2013The phylogeography debate and the epistemology of model-based evolutionary biology12 cited
  • 2014Underdetermination and decomposition in Kepler's Astronomia Nova

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

9 cited
  • 2014Seeing the wood for the trees: philosophical aspects of classical, Bayesian and likelihood approaches in statistical inference and some implications for phylogenetic analysis9 cited