References

• 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
• 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials9,314 cited
• 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
• 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
• 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
• 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
• 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
• 2008Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study2,534 cited
• 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
• 2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited
• 1998The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials769 cited
• 1998Effect of the Statistical Significance of Results on the Time to Completion and Publication of Randomized Efficacy Trials631 cited
• 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement