Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Confidence intervals permit, but don’t guarantee, better inference than statistical significance testing

12 references·12 citing·43 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1999Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations.2,789 cited
1978Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology.1,949 cited
2004Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research.1,033 cited
1996Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers.783 cited
2004The Persistence of Underpowered Studies in Psychological Research: Causes, Consequences, and Remedies.655 cited
2002What Future Quantitative Social Science Research Could Look Like: Confidence Intervals for Effect Sizes539 cited
2001A Primer on the Understanding, Use, and Calculation of Confidence Intervals That Are Based on Central and Noncentral Distributions527 cited
2001Significance, Effect Sizes, Stepwise Methods, and Other Issues: Strong Arguments Move the Field210 cited
1998Surrogates for Theories196 cited
1978Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology.188 cited
1996Directional decisions for two-tailed tests: Power, error rates, and sample size.89 cited
1998In praise of brilliance: Where that praise really belongs.64 cited

Cited by

n.d.Caveats for using statistical significance tests in research assessments65 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2015Is the call to abandon p-values the red herring of the replicability crisis?62 cited

2019The Continued Prevalence of Dichotomous Inferences at CHI60 cited

2019Statistical significance testing and p-values: Defending the indefensible? A discussion paper and position statement46 cited

2016Let it be and keep on going! Acceptance and daily occupational well-being in relation to negative work events.43 cited

2016Approaching a fair deal for significance and other concerns42 cited

2013The New Statistics: A How‐To Guide40 cited

2017The “New Statistics” and Nullifying the Null: Twelve Actions for Improving Quantitative Accounting Research Quality and Integrity29 cited

2014Interpreting effect sizes: Toward a quantitative cumulative social psychology25 cited

2021Informal versus formal judgment of statistical models: The case of normality assumptions19 cited

2023A Knowledge Mobilization Framework: Toward Evidence-Based Statistical Communication Practices in Education Research9 cited

2018Perceived Statistical Knowledge Level and Self-Reported Statistical Practice Among Academic Psychologists8 cited