The Career Trajectories of Health Care Professionals Practicing With Permanent Disabilities

Leslie J. Neal-Boylan · Amy Hopkins · Rachel Skeete · Sarah B. Hartmann · Lisa I. Iezzoni · Marcella Nuñez-Smith

35 citations0/0 files storedAcademic Medicine

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Disability Education and Employment Medical Practices and Rehabilitation Retirement, Disability, and Employment

Abstract

PURPOSE: The authors sought to generate insights and hypotheses about the professional experiences of registered nurses and physicians with self-identified disabilities to inform local and national policy conversations on supporting a diverse health care workforce. METHOD: In 2009-2010, the authors conducted in-depth interviews in person and over the telephone with a sample of licensed registered nurses and physicians across the country who self-identified as having a permanent disability. They coded the interview transcripts to identify key themes across the participants' responses. RESULTS: The authors interviewed 10 registered nurses and 10 physicians. Five novel and consistent themes emerged from the data analysis: (1) Living and working with a physical/sensory disability narrows the career choices and trajectories of nurses and physicians, (2) nurses and physicians struggle with decisions regarding whether to disclose and discuss their disabilities at work, (3) nurses and physicians rarely seek legally guaranteed workplace accommodations, instead viewing patient safety as a personal responsibility, (4) interpersonal interactions often reflect the institutional climate and set the tone for how welcome nurses and physicians feel at work, and (5) reactions to workplace disability-related challenges run an emotional spectrum from anger and grief to resilience and optimism. CONCLUSIONS: The responses revealed several missed opportunities for supporting health care professionals with disabilities in the workplace. These findings should inform the continuing debate regarding what defines "reasonable accommodation" and how to create a workplace that is welcoming for nurses and physicians with disabilities.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 35 citations exist upstream.

References

2007Qualitative Data Analysis for Health Services Research: Developing Taxonomy, Themes, and Theory 1995Qualitative Research: Rigour and qualitative research 2001The art and science of clinical knowledge: evidence beyond measures and numbers 2002Reasonable Accommodations for Medical Faculty With Disabilities 2008“A wealth of knowledge”: A survey of the employment experiences of older nurses and midwives in the NHS 1997Finishing the bridge to diversity

Cited by

2013Providing culturally competent supervision to trainees with disabilities in rehabilitation settings.2020How inclusive are we, really?2013How Persons with a Neuromuscular Disease Perceive Employment Participation: A Qualitative Study 2015Registered Nurses With Disabilities: Legal Rights and Responsibilities 2017“Forget about the glass ceiling, I’m stuck in a glass box”: A meta-ethnography of work participation for persons with physical disabilities

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.