Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis

6 references·16 citing·46 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
1996The cochrane database of systematic reviews5,989 cited
2008A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis2,562 cited
2008Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study2,534 cited
2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
2012Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews837 cited

Cited by

2017A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery623 cited
2020Music therapy for stress reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis443 cited
2014Predictive distributions for between‐study heterogeneity and simple methods for their application in Bayesian meta‐analysis410 cited
2020Social media use and risky behaviors in adolescents: A meta‐analysis410 cited
2014Predictive distributions were developed for the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analyses of continuous outcome data396 cited
2018Bias caused by sampling error in meta-analysis with small sample sizes336 cited
2020Bayesian Random-Effects Meta-Analysis Using the bayesmeta R Package306 cited
2019

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Defining the criteria for including studies and how they will be grouped for the synthesis

306 cited

2018Dealing with effect size multiplicity in systematic reviews and meta‐analyses292 cited

2013Assessing baseline imbalance in randomised trials: implications for the Cochrane risk of bias tool273 cited

2017Methodological Standards for Meta-Analyses and Qualitative Systematic Reviews of Cardiac Prevention and Treatment Studies: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association271 cited

2017The Hartung‐Knapp modification for random‐effects meta‐analysis: A useful refinement but are there any residual concerns?252 cited

2016A Guide to Conducting a Meta-Analysis238 cited

2018Methods to calculate uncertainty in the estimated overall effect size from a random‐effects meta‐analysis235 cited

2018A comparison of seven random‐effects models for meta‐analyses that estimate the summary odds ratio203 cited

2019Comparison of four heterogeneity measures for meta‐analysis186 cited