SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication
4 references·16 citing·47 second hop
Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication (2002)Fourth International Congress on Peer Rev…The Hidden Research Paper (2002)The Hidden Research PaperEffects of Editorial Peer Review (2002)Effects of Editorial Peer Rev…A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine (1992)A Difficult Balance: Editoria…Journal Peer Review (1985)Journal Peer ReviewThree Decades of Peer Review Congresses (2018)Three Decades of Peer Review …The Glacial Pace of Scientific Publishing: Why It Hurts Everyone and What We Can Do To Fix It (2012)The Glacial Pace of Scientifi…Peer Review: Past, Present, and Future (2012)Peer Review: Past, Present, a…To publish or perish: How to review a manuscript (2011)To publish or perish: How to …El peer review de las revistas científicas en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales: políticas y prácticas editoriales declaradas (2011)El peer review de las revista…Integrity in Scientific Publishing (2010)Integrity in Scientific Publi…Technical editing of research reports in biomedical journals (2007)Technical editing of research…Statistical Reviewers Improve Reporting in Biomedical Articles: A Randomized Trial (2007)Statistical Reviewers Improve…Peer review in open access scientific journals. (2007)Peer review in open access sc…Elaboración de directrices para la publicación de investigación biomédica: proceso y fundamento científico (2005)Elaboración de directrices pa…At the frontier of biomedical publication: Chicago 2005 (2005)At the frontier of biomedical…Travelling but never arriving: reflections of a retiring editor (2004)Travelling but never arriving…Roles for scientific societies in promoting integrity in publication ethics (2003)Roles for scientific societie…Peer review time: how late is late in a small medical journal? (2003)Peer review time: how late is…Fifth international congress on peer review and biomedical publication (2003)Fifth international congress …The significance of the peer review process against the background of bias: priority ratings of reviewers and editors and the prediction of citation, the role of geographical bias (2002)The significance of the peer …Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman! (1986)When Authorship Fails (1997)When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable (1997)Multiple Authorship and Article Type in Journals of Urology across the Atlantic: Trends over the Past Six Decades (2012)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Estudio observacional: evaluación de la calidad metodológica de la investigación diagnóstica en España tras la publicación de la guía STARD (2009)Reporting guidelines for primary research: Saying what you did (2010)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA) Statement on the Reporting Quality of Published Genetic Association Studies (2016)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Impact of STROBE Statement Publication on Quality of Observational Study Reporting: Interrupted Time Series versus Before-After Analysis (2013)Why the resistance to statistical innovations? Bridging the communication gap. (2013)Publishing Ethics and Predatory Practices: A Dilemma for All Stakeholders of Science Communication (2015)Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism (1990)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review (2007)The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals (2019)Science in Action (1987)How to Write a Research Paper (2004)Research Ethics III: Publication Practices and Authorship, Conflicts of Interest, and Research Misconduct (2010)Consistency in the Analysis and Reporting of Primary End Points in Oncology Randomized Controlled Trials From Registration to Publication: A Systematic Review (2011)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation (2011)The rough guide to systematic reviews and meta-analyses. (2011)Are peer-review activities related to reviewer bibliometric performance? A scientometric analysis of Publons (2017)Evidence on peer review—scientific quality control or smokescreen? (1999)End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer experiments (2011)A descriptive analysis of the characteristics and the peer review process of systematic review protocols published in an open peer review journal from 2012 to 2017 (2019)The high resource impact of reformatting requirements for scientific papers (2019)Inconsistent views among systematic review authors toward publishing protocols as peer-reviewed articles: an international survey (2020)Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system (1971)Peer review in biomedical publication (1974)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)The Effects of Blinding on Acceptance of Research Papers by Peer Review (1994)Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? (2000)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Underreporting research is scientific misconduct (1990)Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct (1990)Towards theorizing peer review (2022)Challenges and Controversies in Peer Review (2023)Peer Review and Scientific Publication at a Crossroads (2023)A COMPARISON OF THE INFORMATION SEEKING PATTERNS OF RESEARCHERS IN THE PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES (1993)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2002Effects of Editorial Peer Review347 cited
  • 1992A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine212 cited
  • 1985Journal Peer Review163 cited
  • 2002The Hidden Research Paper75 cited

Cited by

  • 2007Statistical Reviewers Improve Reporting in Biomedical Articles: A Randomized Trial112 cited
  • 2002The significance of the peer review process against the background of bias: priority ratings of reviewers and editors and the prediction of citation, the role of geographical bias67 cited
  • 2005Elaboración de directrices para la publicación de investigación biomédica: proceso y fundamento científico43 cited
  • 2018Three Decades of Peer Review Congresses39 cited
  • 2010Integrity in Scientific Publishing34 cited
  • 2012The Glacial Pace of Scientific Publishing: Why It Hurts Everyone and What We Can Do To Fix It28 cited
  • 2011To publish or perish: How to review a manuscript22 cited
  • 2003Roles for scientific societies in promoting integrity in publication ethics22 cited
  • 2003Peer review time: how late is late in a small medical journal?21 cited
  • 2007Technical editing of research reports in biomedical journals20 cited
  • 2012Peer Review: Past, Present, and Future

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

17 cited
  • 2011El peer review de las revistas científicas en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales: políticas y prácticas editoriales declaradas15 cited
  • 2004Travelling but never arriving: reflections of a retiring editor15 cited
  • 2005At the frontier of biomedical publication: Chicago 200514 cited
  • 2003Fifth international congress on peer review and biomedical publication14 cited
  • 2007Peer review in open access scientific journals.12 cited