SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Using Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness to Make Drug Coverage Decisions
1 references·16 citing·45 second hop
Using Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness to Make Drug Coverage Decisions (2009)Using Effectiveness and Cost-effectivenes…Does NICE have a cost‐effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? A binary choice analysis (2004)Does NICE have a cost‐effecti…Using health technology assessment to assess the value of new medicines: results of a systematic review and expert consultation across eight European countries (2017)Using health technology asses…Postapproval studies of drugs initially approved by the FDA on the basis of limited evidence: systematic review (2017)Postapproval studies of drugs…Why do health technology assessment coverage recommendations for the same drugs differ across settings? Applying a mixed methods framework to systematically compare orphan drug decisions in four European countries (2016)Why do health technology asse…The Social Value Of Vaccination Programs: Beyond Cost-Effectiveness (2016)The Social Value Of Vaccinati…Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Case Studies: Factors Influencing Divergent HTA Reimbursement Recommendations in Australia, Canada, England, and Scotland (2016)Health Technology Assessment …Health Economics at the Crossroads of Centuries – From the Past to the Future (2016)Health Economics at the Cross…Reimbursement Decisions for Pharmaceuticals in Sweden: The Impact of Disease Severity and Cost Effectiveness (2015)Reimbursement Decisions for P…Attributes and weights in health care priority setting: A systematic review of what counts and to what extent (2015)Attributes and weights in hea…International Variability in the Reimbursement of Cancer Drugs by Publically Funded Drug Programs (2012)International Variability in …Commonalities and differences in HTA outcomes: A comparative analysis of five countries and implications for coverage decisions (2012)Commonalities and differences…Challenges in the Development and Reimbursement of Personalized Medicine—Payer and Manufacturer Perspectives and Implications for Health Economics and Outcomes Research: A Report of the ISPOR Personalized Medicine Special Interest Group (2012)Challenges in the Development…The social value of a QALY: raising the bar or barring the raise? (2011)The social value of a QALY: r…Sensitivity Analysis in Cost-Effectiveness Studies (2011)Sensitivity Analysis in Cost-…Risk sharing arrangements for pharmaceuticals: potential considerations and recommendations for European payers (2010)Risk sharing arrangements for…Population based screening for chronic kidney disease: cost effectiveness study (2010)Population based screening fo…Facts, Fallacies, and Politics of Comparative Effectiveness Research: Part I. Basic Considerations (2010)Facts, Fallacies, and Politic…Small Area Variations in Health Care Delivery (1973)Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials (2003)The Implications of Regional Variations in Medicare Spending. Part 2: Health Outcomes and Satisfaction with Care (2003)Preferences for life saving programs: how the public discounts time and age (1994)QALY maximisation and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature (2004)Cost-utility analysis of a potential lung cancer screening program for a high-risk population in Germany: A modelling approach (2018)Examining Equity Effects of Health Interventions in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: A Systematic Review (2020)HTA methodology and value frameworks for evaluation and policy making for cell and gene therapies (2020)The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies (1999)Assessing cost-effectiveness in healthcare: history of the $50,000 per QALY threshold (2008)Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions (2008)International survey on willingness‐to‐pay (WTP) for one additional QALY gained: what is the threshold of cost effectiveness? (2009)Health systems in transition. (2010)Managed entry agreements for pharmaceuticals: the European experience (2013)Cancer drugs in 16 European countries, Australia, and New Zealand: a cross-country price comparison study (2015)How Can Pricing and Reimbursement Policies Improve Affordable Access to Medicines? Lessons Learned from European Countries (2017)Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (1996)Principles of Good Practice for Decision Analytic Modeling in Health-Care Evaluation: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices—Modeling Studies (2003)Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (2005)The Future of Precision Medicine: Potential Impacts for Health Technology Assessment (2018)Cost-effectiveness of precision medicine: a scoping review (2019)Being Precise About Precision Medicine: What Should Value Frameworks Incorporate to Address Precision Medicine? A Report of the Personalized Precision Medicine Special Interest Group (2020)How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. (1992)Cost-effectiveness of chronic kidney disease mass screening test in Japan (2011)Cost effectiveness of strategies to combat cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and tobacco use in sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia: mathematical modelling study (2012)Cost-effectiveness of screening for chronic kidney disease in the general adult population: a systematic review (2023)Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health (2008)Global, regional, and national age–sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 (2014)Improving adult immunization equity: Where do the published research literature and existing resources lead? (2017)Protecting individuals living with overweight and obesity: Attitudes and concerns toward COVID‐19 vaccination in Canada (2021)Sociodemographic and socioeconomic disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake in Belgium: a nationwide record linkage study (2023)A standardised, generic, validated approach to stratify the magnitude of clinical benefit that can be anticipated from anti-cancer therapies: the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) (2015)American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement: A Conceptual Framework to Assess the Value of Cancer Treatment Options (2015)Methods for the estimation of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence cost-effectiveness threshold (2015)Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for evaluating new medicines in Health Technology Assessment and beyond: The Advance Value Framework (2017)Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Support Health Technology Assessment Agencies: Benefits, Limitations, and the Way Forward (2019)A Health Opportunity Cost Threshold for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in the United States (2020)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)U.S. Government Accountability Office (2013)Clinical Trial Evidence Supporting US Food and Drug Administration Approval of Novel Cancer Therapies Between 2000 and 2016 (2020)Generating comparative evidence on new drugs and devices after approval (2020)Generating comparative evidence on new drugs and devices before approval (2020)Cost-Effectiveness Analysis and the Consistency of Decision Making (2001)Use of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Health-Care Resource Allocation Decision-Making: How Are Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds Expected to Emerge? (2004)Potential approaches for the pricing of cancer medicines across Europe to enhance the sustainability of healthcare systems and the implications (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2004Does NICE have a cost‐effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? A binary choice analysis710 cited

Cited by

  • 2017Using health technology assessment to assess the value of new medicines: results of a systematic review and expert consultation across eight European countries306 cited
  • 2010Risk sharing arrangements for pharmaceuticals: potential considerations and recommendations for European payers255 cited
  • 2015Attributes and weights in health care priority setting: A systematic review of what counts and to what extent179 cited
  • 2012Challenges in the Development and Reimbursement of Personalized Medicine—Payer and Manufacturer Perspectives and Implications for Health Economics and Outcomes Research: A Report of the ISPOR Personalized Medicine Special Interest Group161 cited
  • 2010Population based screening for chronic kidney disease: cost effectiveness study160 cited
  • 2017Postapproval studies of drugs initially approved by the FDA on the basis of limited evidence: systematic review121 cited
  • 2015Reimbursement Decisions for Pharmaceuticals in Sweden: The Impact of Disease Severity and Cost Effectiveness116 cited
  • 2010Facts, Fallacies, and Politics of Comparative Effectiveness Research: Part I. Basic Considerations110 cited
  • 2016The Social Value Of Vaccination Programs: Beyond Cost-Effectiveness105 cited
  • 2016Health Economics at the Crossroads of Centuries – From the Past to the Future103 cited
  • 2011The social value of a QALY: raising the bar or barring the raise?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

98 cited
  • 2012Commonalities and differences in HTA outcomes: A comparative analysis of five countries and implications for coverage decisions93 cited
  • 2011Sensitivity Analysis in Cost-Effectiveness Studies92 cited
  • 2012International Variability in the Reimbursement of Cancer Drugs by Publically Funded Drug Programs89 cited
  • 2016Why do health technology assessment coverage recommendations for the same drugs differ across settings? Applying a mixed methods framework to systematically compare orphan drug decisions in four European countries82 cited
  • 2016Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Case Studies: Factors Influencing Divergent HTA Reimbursement Recommendations in Australia, Canada, England, and Scotland79 cited