No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Delayed nonmatching-to-sample performance was examined in children and found to be poor from 12 months until almost 2 years even at 5-s delay, although 5 s is well within such children's memory capacity. After 12 months of age, performance did not differ by delay (5 or 30 s). Because children's problems seemed largely unrelated to the task's memory demands, the 2 final studies explored the role of other cognitive abilities (deduction of an abstract rule, speed of processing, and resistance to interference or distraction). Telling children the rule or quadrupling sample presentation time had little effect. Because a salient stimulus (the reward) might interfere with keeping one's attention on the sample, the reward was omitted during initial sample presentation. This helped; at the 5-s delay, 15-month-olds performed at least as well as 21-month-olds in the basic condition, and 12-month-olds performed almost as well. Implications for the cognitive abilities improving during the 2nd year and for the functions of the medial temporal lobe are discussed.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 57 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.