SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Association of Cardiovascular Trial Registration With Positive Study Findings
3 references·6 citing·32 second hop
Association of Cardiovascular Trial Registration With Positive Study Findings (2014)Association of Cardiovascular Trial Regis…Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials (2012)Influence of Reported Study D…Principles for international registration of protocol information and results from human trials of health related interventions: Ottawa statement (part 1) (2005)Principles for international …Clinical Trial Registration (2004)Clinical Trial RegistrationSupporting study registration to reduce research waste (2024)Supporting study registration…Registration of health and medical research (2021)Registration of health and me…Predicting Violent Behavior: What Can Neuroscience Add? (2017)Predicting Violent Behavior: …On Fishing for Significance and Statistician’s Degree of Freedom in the Era of Big Molecular Data (2017)On Fishing for Significance a…Premature trial discontinuation often not accurately reflected in registries: comparison of registry records with publications (2016)Premature trial discontinuati…Reporting of a Publicly Accessible Protocol and Its Association With Positive Study Findings in Cardiovascular Trials (from the Epidemiological Study of Randomized Trials [ESORT]) (2015)Reporting of a Publicly Acces…Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010)International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (2014)Publication trends of study protocols in rehabilitation (2018)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (2012)Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder (2012)Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods (2014)Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors (2005)Publication bias as a threat to the validity of meta-analytic results (2007)ADDIS: A decision support system for evidence-based medicine (2012)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. (2015)Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2004)Compliance of clinical trial registries with the World Health Organization minimum data set: a survey (2009)Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications (2014)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Reporting and methodological quality of studies that use Mendelian randomisation in UK Biobank: a meta-epidemiological study (2022)Promoting Openness and Transparency to Advance Pain Science: New Initiatives at The Journal of Pain (2024)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)Patient-Important Outcomes in Registered Diabetes Trials (2008)Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network (2010)Assessing risk of bias due to missing results in a synthesis (2019)Neuroscience and the Criminal Justice System (2018)Neuroprediction and A.I. in Forensic Psychiatry and Criminal Justice: A Neurolaw Perspective (2020)Is the Psychopathic Brain an Artifact of Coding Bias? A Systematic Review (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials1,047 cited
  • 2004Clinical Trial Registration579 cited
  • 2005Principles for international registration of protocol information and results from human trials of health related interventions: Ottawa statement (part 1)236 cited

Cited by

  • 2017Predicting Violent Behavior: What Can Neuroscience Add?90 cited
  • 2021Registration of health and medical research23 cited
  • 2016Premature trial discontinuation often not accurately reflected in registries: comparison of registry records with publications20 cited
  • 2015Reporting of a Publicly Accessible Protocol and Its Association With Positive Study Findings in Cardiovascular Trials (from the Epidemiological Study of Randomized Trials [ESORT])12 cited
  • 2017On Fishing for Significance and Statistician’s Degree of Freedom in the Era of Big Molecular Data9 cited
  • 2024Supporting study registration to reduce research waste7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work