‘For Better or Worse?’ Lesbian and Gay Marriage

Abstract

This special feature takes forward the debate on lesbian and gay marriage by providing an explicitly feministforum for the discussion and by grounding the contributions both in personal experience and in political reality. The contributions range from theoretical arguments to personal stories to accounts of front-line activism. The experienceof getting ‘married’ is described by Kathleen and Becky Liddle, and Kevin Bourassa. Bourassa’s paper illustrates that for lesbians and gay men these deeply personal events at times occupy centre stage in a wider political battle for ‘equality’. Elizabeth Peel and Rosie Harding provide an edited transcript of a discussion from early in their relationship about whether they would register theirrelationship – if this were an option available to lesbians and gay men in the UK – and whether they would welcome some kind of ceremony or ritual to mark this. Feminist theory takes centre stage in Maria Bevacqua’s argument about why both liberals and radicals should support lesbians’ and gay men’s right to marry. Catherine Donovan also draws on radical and critical perspectives, but to argueagainst marriage. She maintains that marriage as an institution and as a model of love is not the ‘best’ that lesbians and gay men can do. The experience of emigratingas a gay couple is discussed by Martin Holt. He argues that immigration laws compel lesbians and gay men to demonstrate how their relationships conform to heterosexual norms. Finally, the debate is extended beyond the confinesof the West in Martin Saavedra’s contribution, which outlines the current status of same-sex marriage in Latin America.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 25 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.