Crime in the classroom: Detection and prevention of cheating on multiple-choice exams

David N. Harpp · James J. Hogan

51 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Chemical Education

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic integrity and plagiarism Educational Technology and Assessment Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection

Abstract

Detecting unusually similar pairs of multiple choice exams and commonsense prevention measures that virtually eliminate academic dishonesty (including how to refute the old, "We studied together therefore our exams are similar" line).

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 51 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2010Identifying and profiling scholastic cheaters: Their personality, cognitive ability, and motivation.2016Multiple-choice questions: Tips for optimizing assessment in-seat and online.1996Crime in the Classroom: An Extension 2008Cheating on Multiplechoice Exams: Monitoring, Assessment, and an Optional Assignment 2008The effect of fraud triangle factors on students’ cheating behaviors 2013Detection of Test Collusion via Kullback–Leibler Divergence 2015Psychology Graduate Students Weigh In: Qualitative Analysis of Academic Dishonesty and Suggestion Prevention Strategies 2011Detection of Answer Copying Based on the Structure of a High-Stakes Test

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.