Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Psychological models of deferred decision making

6 references·16 citing·45 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1960MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 19591,649 cited
1960Models for Choice-Reaction Time632 cited
1965Optimal strategies for seeking information: Models for statistics, choice reaction times, and human information processing295 cited
1985The psychological cost of waiting246 cited
1965SOME ALTERNATIVE STOCHASTIC MODELS OF CHOICE 1135 cited
1970Choice behavior in an optional stopping task122 cited

Cited by

1994Time course of comparison.180 cited
1990Truth and consequences of ordinal differences in statistical distributions: Toward a theory of hierarchical inference.166 cited
2019Revealed strength of preference: Inference from response times108 cited
2012Diagnostic Accuracy Under Congestion108 cited
1997Context and Task Effects on Choice Deferral99 cited
2004Stopping rule use during information search in design problems99 cited
2016Comparing fixed and collapsing boundary versions of the diffusion model93 cited
2000Optimal stopping behavior with relative ranks: the secretary problem with unknown population size90 cited
1992Linking together different measures of preference: A dynamic model of matching derived from decision field theory

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

83 cited

2017Time-varying decision boundaries: insights from optimality analysis81 cited

2022Self-motivated and directed learning across the lifespan72 cited

2019Caution in decision-making under time pressure is mediated by timing ability60 cited

2019The formation of preference in risky choice56 cited

2016Irrational time allocation in decision-making54 cited

2014Phantom readings: the case of modified numerals52 cited

2010The right tool for the job? Comparing an evidence accumulation and a naive strategy selection model of decision making51 cited