SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Comprehensive Reliability Assessment and Comparison of Quality Indicators and Their Components
6 references·1 citing·17 second hop
Comprehensive Reliability Assessment and Comparison of Quality Indicators and Their Components (1997)Comprehensive Reliability Assessment and …The meaning of kappa: Probabilistic concepts of reliability and validity revisited (1996)The meaning of kappa: Probabi…High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes (1990)High agreement but low kappa:…High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes (1990)High agreement but low Kappa:…Reporting on Methods in Clinical Trials (1982)Reporting on Methods in Clini…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)A Coefficient of Agreement fo…The case for comprehensive quality indicator reliability assessment (2001)The case for comprehensive qu…Bias, prevalence and kappa (1993)Assessing observer agreement when describing and classifying functioning with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (2007)A Formal Proof of a Paradox Associated with Cohen’s Kappa (2010)Observer agreement paradoxes in 2x2 tables: comparison of agreement measures (2014)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2010)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)Measurement of Observer Agreement (2003)Inter-Coder Agreement for Computational Linguistics (2008)A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples (2013)Assessing the Quality of Randomization From Reports of Controlled Trials Published in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals (1994)Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials:Current Issues and Future Directions (1996)Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals (2005)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 1960A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales42,335 cited
  • 1990High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes3,024 cited
  • 1990High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes1,836 cited
  • 1982Reporting on Methods in Clinical Trials509 cited
  • 1996The meaning of kappa: Probabilistic concepts of reliability and validity revisited126 cited

Cited by

  • 2001The case for comprehensive quality indicator reliability assessment13 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work