Poststructural Logic in Marx's Theory of Value

Abstract

In this essay I use Louis Althusser's observation concerning the synchrony and diachrony of Marx's logic in Capital to detail changes in the meaning of value, defined as socially necessary abstract labor time, throughout the three volumes of Capital. I use this analysis to identify three common types of logical error in reading Marx that result from failing to recognize this aspect of his methodology, and I provide examples to illustrate each of these common errors. I then argue that, by recognizing the synchrony and diachrony of Marx's method, it is possible to read value theory in a way that is noneconomistic but that retains value and class as central concepts in the understanding of the social totality.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 18 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.