Analysis and synthesis: On scientific method – based on a study by bernhard riemann

Tom Ritchey

96 citations0/0 files storedSystems Research

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Philosophy and History of Science Philosophy, Science, and History Complex Systems and Decision Making

Abstract

Abstract There are important situations in which a method can be regarded as more suitable than the other. This concerns the question of which method is most appropriate as the primary method of chief point of departure for the study of a given system or object of scientific inquiry. This article deals with the foundations of analysis and synthesis as scientific methods, and especially with the requirements for the successful application of these methods.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 96 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2006Problem structuring using computer-aided morphological analysis 2017General morphological analysis as a basic scientific modelling method 2007Analysis, synthesis, systems thinking and the scientific method: rediscovering the importance of open systems 2011Modeling Alternative Futures with General Morphological Analysis 2005Task partitioning in new product development teams: A knowledge and learning perspective 2009LINKING BIG: THE CONTINUING PROMISE OF EVOLUTIONARY SYNTHESIS 2011General Morphological Analysis (GMA)2012Outline for a Morphology of Modelling Methods Contribution to a General Theory of Modelling

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.