Citation map · Study

Improving the quality of reporting alcohol outcome studies: Effects of the CONSORT statement

14 references·6 citing·41 second hop

this work references cited by second hop

References

1994Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology.9,345 cited
1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
2008Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration2,290 cited
2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited
1995Training in and Dissemination of Empirically-Validated Psychological Treatments: Report and Recommendations574 cited
2008Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'241 cited
1998CONSORT: An Evolving Tool to Help Improve the Quality of Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials241 cited
2006Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement227 cited
2006Standards of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in General Surgery161 cited
2004Has CONSORT improved the reporting of randomized controlled trials in the palliative care literature? A systematic review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

References

Cited by