SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Criminal Liability Issues Created by Autonomous Vehicles
0 references·12 citing·56 second hop
Criminal Liability Issues Created by Autonomous Vehicles (2012)Criminal Liability Issues Created by Auto…Navigating the Legal Maze (2024)Navigating the Legal MazeIndustry 4.0 an empirical analysis of users’ intention in the automotive sector (2021)Industry 4.0 an empirical ana…What drives the acceptance of autonomous driving? An investigation of acceptance factors from an end-user's perspective (2020)What drives the acceptance of…Review and analysis of the importance of autonomous vehicles liability: a systematic literature review (2020)Review and analysis of the im…The looming challenges of regulating high level autonomous vehicles (2019)The looming challenges of reg…Pigouvian road congestion pricing under autonomous driving mode choice (2019)Pigouvian road congestion pri…Artificial intelligence and criminal liability: problems of becoming a new type of crime subject (2019)Artificial intelligence and c…Governing autonomous vehicles: emerging responses for safety, liability, privacy, cybersecurity, and industry risks (2018)Governing autonomous vehicles…Irresponsibilities, inequalities and injustice for autonomous vehicles (2017)Irresponsibilities, inequalit…Critical features of autonomous road transport from the perspective of technological regulation and law (2017)Critical features of autonomo…Beyond Liability (2017)Beyond LiabilityResponsibility for Crashes of Autonomous Vehicles: An Ethical Analysis (2014)Responsibility for Crashes of…Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions (2013)Human Factors Issues Associated with Limited Ability Autonomous Driving Systems: Drivers’ Allocation of Visual Attention to the Forward Roadway (2013)Machine Ethics and Automated Vehicles (2014)Artificial Intelligence, Responsibility Attribution, and a Relational Justification of Explainability (2019)From What to How: An Initial Review of Publicly Available AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices (2019)Bias in computer systems (1996)The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata (2004)Punishment and Responsibility (2008)Artificial Intelligence Regulation: a framework for governance (2021)The European Commission report on ethics of connected and automated vehicles and the future of ethics of transportation (2021)Responsible AI Through Conceptual Engineering (2022)A Critical View of Driver Behavior Models: What Do We Know, What Should We Do? (1985)Predestination: Inferring Destinations from Partial Trajectories (2006)Ghost driver: A field study investigating the interaction between pedestrians and driverless vehicles (2016)A Hidden Markov Framework to Capture Human–Machine Interaction in Automated Vehicles (2019)Artificial Intelligence in Society (2019)Where We Come from and Where We Are Going: A Systematic Review of Human Factors Research in Driving Automation (2020)The Trolley Problem (1985)Human error taxonomies applied to driving: A generic driver error taxonomy and its implications for intelligent transport systems (2008)Machines without Principals: Liability Rules and Artificial Intelligence (2014)Merging self-driving cars with the law (2018)Automated and Autonomous Driving in Freight Transport - Opportunities and Limitations (2020)Sustainable Data Governance for Cooperative, Connected and Automated Mobility in the European Union (2021)Race Against the Machine: How the Digital Revolution is Accelerating Innovation, Driving Productivity, and Irreversibly Transforming Employment and the Economy (2011)Public Opinion on Automated Driving: Results of an International Questionnaire Among 5,000 Respondents (2014)The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? (2016)Governance of artificial intelligence (2021)Public acceptance and perception of autonomous vehicles: a comprehensive review (2021)The Economics of Welfare (1933)A Theory of the Allocation of Time (1965)CONGESTION THEORY AND TRANSPORT INVESTMENT (1969)Pricing of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles in Mixed-Traffic Networks (2021)Autonomous cars and activity-based bottleneck model: How do in-vehicle activities determine aggregate travel patterns? (2022)Managing carbon emissions in urban mobility system: A credit-based reservation scheme (2024)Liability for damages caused by artificial intelligence (2015)Talking to Bots: Symbiotic Agency and the Case of Tay (2016)Artificial Intelligence from the Point of View of Law (2018)Criminological classification of robots: risk-based approach (2021)Can AI be Evil: The Criminal Capacities of ANI (2023)Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void (2003)The Evolution of Fintech: A New Post-Crisis Paradigm? (2015)The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles (2016)Selfish or Utilitarian Automated Vehicles? Deontological Evaluation and Public Acceptance (2021)A precautionary approach to autonomous vehicles (2023)Ethical Decision-Making for Self-Driving Vehicles: A Proposed Model & List of Value-Laden Terms that Warrant (Technical) Specification (2024)Environmental Impacts of Urban Sprawl: A Survey of the Literature and Proposed Research Agenda (2001)Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study (2017)From robotics technology to environmental crimes involving robots (2021)Emerging Technologies (2022)Supervising the self-driving car: Situation awareness and fatigue during highly automated driving (2023)Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error (1981)The theory of planned behavior (1991)Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. (2003)Drivers of Digital Transformation Adoption: A Weight and Meta-Analysis (2021)A Survey on Remote Operation of Road Vehicles (2022)Determinants of intention to use autonomous vehicles: Findings from PLS-SEM and ANFIS (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2018Governing autonomous vehicles: emerging responses for safety, liability, privacy, cybersecurity, and industry risks616 cited
  • 2020What drives the acceptance of autonomous driving? An investigation of acceptance factors from an end-user's perspective360 cited
  • 2014Responsibility for Crashes of Autonomous Vehicles: An Ethical Analysis341 cited
  • 2019The looming challenges of regulating high level autonomous vehicles64 cited
  • 2020Review and analysis of the importance of autonomous vehicles liability: a systematic literature review48 cited
  • 2017Irresponsibilities, inequalities and injustice for autonomous vehicles48 cited
  • 2019Pigouvian road congestion pricing under autonomous driving mode choice40 cited
  • 2017Critical features of autonomous road transport from the perspective of technological regulation and law36 cited
  • 2019Artificial intelligence and criminal liability: problems of becoming a new type of crime subject25 cited
  • 2017Beyond Liability14 cited
  • 2021Industry 4.0 an empirical analysis of users’ intention in the automotive sector11 cited
  • 2024Navigating the Legal Maze10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work