SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The multi-dimensionality of journal impact · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleThe multi-dimensionality of journal impact

Wolfgang Glänzel2008

OA

Articlegreen2008

The multi-dimensionality of journal impact

Wolfgang Glänzel

34 citations·0/0 files stored·Scientometrics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Psychology Research and Bibliometrics Web visibility and informetrics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 34 citations exist upstream.

References

2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output 1972Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation 2002Journal impact measures in bibliometric research 1963New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing 2003A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes 2007A systematic analysis of Hirsch-type indices for journals 1980Inequality and Scientific Productivity 1988Journal citation measures: a concise review

Cited by

2012Using Google Scholar for journal impact factors and the h‐index in nationwide publishing assessments in academia – siren songs and air‐raid sirens 2012Grim tales about the impact factor and the h-index in the Web of Science and the Journal Citation Reports databases: reflections on Vanclay’s criticism 2013High-end performance or outlier? Evaluating the tail of scientometric distributions 2009Some comments on Egghe's derivation of the impact factor distribution 2015Comprehensive indicator comparisons intelligible to non-experts: the case of two SNIP versions

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2013Multidimensional Journal Evaluation: Analyzing Scientific Periodicals beyond the Impact Factorarticle · 7 shared references 2015A review of the literature on citation impact indicatorspreprint · 7 shared references 2018Does bibliometric research confer legitimacy to research assessment practice? A sociological study of reputational control, 1972-2016article · 6 shared references 2015Supplementary Report I to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Managementother · 6 shared references 2007Assessing the value of a journal beyond the impact factorarticle · 5 shared references 2010On reliability and robustness of scientometrics indicators based on stochastic models. An evidence-based opinion paperarticle · 5 shared references

Details

Year2008

Typearticle

Published2008-09-17

VenueScientometrics

ISSN-L0138-9130

Languageen

Citations34

Files0 public / 0

Shelfscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Identifiers

doi10.1007/s11192-008-2166-9

openalex_workW1969739632

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2010Eigenfactor and article influence scores in the Journal Citation Reports

2018The lognormal distribution explains the remarkable pattern documented by characteristic scores and scales in scientometrics

2016Understanding the relevance of national culture in international business research: a quantitative analysis