Ubuntu versus the core values of the South African Constitution

Abstract

At the dawn of South Africa’s new era of constitutionalism the Constitutional Court introduced “African law and legal thinking” and ubuntu to South African jurisprudence as part of the Constitution’s source of democratic values. Whereas the Constitutional Court averred on the one hand that African law sustains firmly entrenched gender inequality, it was contended on the other hand that ubuntu is “in consonance with the values of the Constitution in general and the Bill of Rights in particular”. This article deconstructs the concepts “African law and legal thinking” and ubuntu and contends that ubuntu, African law and African religion are not only inseparable but that ubuntu — the basis of African law — sustains the deep-seated patriarchal hierarchy and entrenched inequality in traditional African societies. This article concludes that ubuntu “is [not] in consonance with the values of the Constitution in general and the Bill of Rights in particular”.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 24 citations exist upstream.