References

• 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
• 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
• 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
• 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration5,525 cited
• 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
• 2001Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses2,285 cited
• 2002Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed833 cited
• 2002Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions762 cited
• 2009Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation654 cited
• 1986A quality assessment of randomized control trials of primary treatment of breast cancer.195 cited
• 2005Adequacy and reporting of allocation concealment: review of recent trials published in four general medical journals176 cited
• 2007The reporting quality of randomised controlled trials in surgery: A systematic review142 cited
• 1993Clinical studies in surgical journals—have we improved?138 cited
• 1989How study design affects outcomes in comparisons of therapy. II: Surgical