Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A Three-Decade History of the Duration of Peer Review

8 references·5 citing·40 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2003The politics of publication359 cited
2007An Incentive Solution to the Peer Review Problem175 cited
2008Reviewing Peer Review119 cited
1996Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times?103 cited
2010Pubcreds: Fixing the Peer Review Process by “Privatizing” the Reviewer Commons89 cited
2008The tragedy of the reviewer commons*82 cited
2006Is Peer Review a Game of Chance?81 cited
2009The Golden Rule of Reviewing60 cited

Cited by

2014Reviewer overload and what can we do about it20 cited
2014Improving the reviewing process in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology16 cited
2018Ethics in Peer Review of Academic Journal Articles as Perceived by Authors in the Educational Sciences16 cited
2018Peering into peer review: Good quality reviews of research articles require neither writing too much nor taking too long13 cited
2021Peer reviewing in the contemporary academic communications10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work