Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The pseudodiagnosticity trap: Should participants consider alternative hypotheses?

6 references·4 citing·43 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1987Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing.2,095 cited
1986Information-gathering processes: Diagnosticity, hypothesis-confirmatory strategies, and perceived hypothesis confirmation310 cited
1993Information Relevance, Working Memory, and the Consideration of Alternatives97 cited
1989Statistics in Psychology: An Historical Perspective65 cited
1996On people’s understanding of the diagnostic implications of probabilistic data37 cited
1981The influence of feedback and diagnostic data on pseudodiagnosticity19 cited

Cited by

2014Categorical induction from uncertain premises: Jeffrey's doesn't completely rule12 cited
2014From is to ought, and back: how normative concerns foster progress in reasoning research9 cited
2011Relevance-Driven Information Search in “Pseudodiagnostic” Reasoning5 cited
2016Do people reason when they accept tricky offers? A case of approach and avoidance motivated reasoning2 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work