Atividade, linguagem e trabalho: oposições conceituais na teoria da atividade

Abstract

This paper examines, in the textual production of the so-called Activity Theory (from Charles Goodwin, Yrjö Engeström, Reijo Miettinen e Michael Cole), the theoretical and methodological dispute between marxism and postmodern trends, concerning the notions of activity, language and labour. The paper analyses polyphonic and discourse-ideological effects in the mentioned production, pointing out an attempt to sweep marxism away from Vigotski, Luria e Leontev. Also, the paper discusses the consequences to language and labour studies.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 0 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.