Rethinking the genesis of the Romance periphrastic perfect

Diego de Acosta

54 citations0/0 files storedDiachronica

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation Linguistics and language evolution Historical Linguistics and Language Studies

Abstract

The Romance languages all display periphrastic perfects that can be traced to Latin [habere “have” + noun + perfect participle]. A new survey of the Latin corpus reveals that this string had three distinct structures and values. I argue that the likeliest source of the perfects is a periphrasis denoting the achievement of a result or a persisting resultant state. This implies that the relationship between possessive and auxiliary habere is more complex than previously supposed. Finally, I examine the range of values that this periphrasis takes across the Romance languages. I maintain that the growth of the perfect at the expense of the preterite followed an orderly pattern, with requirements on the temporal denotation of the perfect successively relaxed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 54 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2014Auxiliary Selection in Spanish 2018Grammaticalization in the North Caucasian languages 2018Grammaticalization processes in the languages of South Asia 2018Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective 2012The Old English Have -Perfect and Its Congeners 2018Addressing questions of grammaticalization in creoles 2018Diachronic stories of body-part nouns in some language families of South America 2018Grammaticalization in Africa

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.