Medical Researchers and the Media

Michael S. Wilkes

54 citations0/0 files storedJAMA

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic Publishing and Open Access Journalism and Media Studies Academic Writing and Publishing

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the experience of recently published authors with the news media. DESIGN: A self-administered questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS: All first authors of scientific articles published in JAMA and The New England Journal of Medicine during a 6-month period. Of 397 surveyed, 92% responded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Researchers were asked about (1) their experience with the news media, (2) their attitudes toward the dissemination of health-related research to the general public, and (3) their attitudes toward the lay press. RESULTS: Of respondents, 65% stated that their research was discussed in the lay press, and 60% reported that they were directly contacted by the press. Researchers had positive attitudes toward the press; 86% reported that news reports based on their research were accurate and 44% felt that media coverage would help them achieve their overall professional goals. Positive aspects of media coverage most frequently endorsed were that (1) it improves the image of the profession, (2) it informs the professional community of their research, and (3) it allows the public to understand the topic better. Negative aspects of media coverage were (1) it gives the impression that the researcher is seeking publicity, (2) it creates jealousy among colleagues, and (3) it takes too much time. Researchers were not eager to change the existing dissemination process, yet they endorsed the need for uniform standards concerning relations with the press. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of first authors in two leading medical journals reported substantial media coverage of their research, expressed generally positive sentiments about the press coverage of their work, and expressed a need for consensus on interactions involving the press.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 54 citations exist upstream.

References

1985Survey Research Methods.1974Communication of Innovations: A Cross-Cultural Approach.1989A Five-Item Measure of Socially Desirable Response Set 1991The Ingelfinger Rule Revisited 1981The Ingelfinger Rule

Cited by

2013Reaching “An Audience That You Would Never Dream of Speaking To”: Influential Public Health Researchers' Views on the Role of News Media in Influencing Policy and Public Understanding 2019Medicine and the media: Medical experts’ problems and solutions while working with journalists 1994A National Survey of Public Health Officers' Interactions With the Media 1997The Public Dissemination of Medical Research: Problems and Solutions 1995Newspaper reporting of the medical literature 1992TV or Not TV Communicating Health Information to the Public 2002Delineating (and delimiting) the boundary spanning role of the medical public information officer 2014Media Representations of Genetic Discoveries: Hype in the Headlines?

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.