La suffixation en -et et la question de la productivité

Abstract

Bernard Fradin & Nabil Hathout : -ET suffixation and the question of productivity This article first sketches an analysis of the system of -et suffixation in French. The analysis shows that -ET suffixation involves approximatively fifteen patterns of lexeme formation organized around two poles (Referent and Speaker pole). Building on this analysis, the article examines the productivity of the derivational suffixes -et and -ette in the French newspaper Libération in a five years period. Formal tools provided by H. Baayen are used to gauge the degree of productivity of both affixes. Two partial results are worth mentioning: first, -ette's degree of productivity exceeds that of -et; this result supports the idea that these suffixes must not be considered as exponents of one and same morphological process. Second, not all derivational patterns are productive to the same degree, which means that it is meaningless to speak of the global degree of productivity of -et suffixation, except as the sum of the degrees of productivity obtained for each pattern. lexeme formation organized around two poles (Referent and Speaker pole). Building on this analysis, the article examines the productivity of the derivational suffixes -et and -ette in the French newspaper Libération in a five years period. Formal tools provided by H. Baayen are used to gauge the degree of productivity of both affixes. Two partial results are worth mentioning: first, -ette's degree of productivity exceeds that of -et; this result supports the idea that these suffixes must not be considered as exponents of one and same morphological process. Second, not all derivational patterns are productive to the same degree, which means that it is meaningless to speak of the global degree of productivity of -et suffixation, except as the sum of the degrees of productivity obtained for each pattern.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 35 citations exist upstream.