Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Substantial Agreement of Referee Recommendations at a General Medical Journal – A Peer Review Evaluation at Deutsches Ärzteblatt International

14 references·12 citing·46 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,603 cited
1990High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes3,074 cited
2006Computing inter‐rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement2,210 cited
1990High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes1,841 cited
2009Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals846 cited
1990The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation436 cited
1990Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism365 cited
1990The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review363 cited
2010A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants262 cited
2000Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone?254 cited
2008Resolving the paradoxes224 cited
2010Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care?177 cited
2002The significance of the peer review process against the background of bias: priority ratings of reviewers and editors and the prediction of citation, the role of geographical bias67 cited
2009

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Reviewer and editor biases in journal peer review: an investigation of manuscript refereeing at Angewandte Chemie International Edition

44 cited

Cited by

2016How Robust Are Multirater Interrater Reliability Indices to Changes in Frequency Distribution?131 cited
2017Inter-rater reliability and validity of peer reviews in an interdisciplinary field44 cited
2015Peer Review Evaluation Process of Marie Curie Actions under EU’s Seventh Framework Programme for Research28 cited
2021A retrospective analysis of the peer review of more than 75,000 Marie Curie proposals between 2007 and 201826 cited
2022Journal and disciplinary variations in academic open peer review anonymity, outcomes, and length21 cited
2017The review process in tourism academia: An elaboration of reviewers' extrinsic and intrinsic motivations16 cited
2018Ethics in Peer Review of Academic Journal Articles as Perceived by Authors in the Educational Sciences16 cited
2014A peek behind the curtain: Peer review and editorial decision making at S troke13 cited
2019La revisión por pares (“peer review”) en las revistas científicas: un proceso que requiere intervención11 cited
2024Librarians and information specialists as methodological peer-reviewers: a case-study of the International Journal of Health Governance9 cited
2015Relationship between the duration of peer-review, publication decision, and agreement among reviewers in three Chilean journals8 cited
2021Rejection rate and reasons for rejection after peer review: a case study of a Russian economics journal6 cited