SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
International Variation in Histologic Grading Is Large, and Persistent Feedback Does Not Improve Reproducibility
3 references·2 citing·17 second hop
International Variation in Histologic Grading Is Large, and Persistent Feedback Does Not Improve Reproducibility (2003)International Variation in Histologic Gra…Observer accuracy in estimating proportions in images: implications for the semiquantitative assessment of staining reactions and a proposal for a new system (2001)Observer accuracy in estimati…Efforts to improve interobserver agreement in histopathological grading (1995)Efforts to improve interobser…Information and observer disagreement in histopathology (1994)Information and observer disa…Learning more from the inter-rater reliability of interstitial fibrosis assessment beyond just a statistic (2023)Learning more from the inter-…Reliability of deceased‐donor procurement kidney biopsy images uploaded in United Network for Organ Sharing (2018)Reliability of deceased‐donor…Kappa statistics as indicators of quality assurance in histopathology and cytopathology. (1996)Grading and scoring in histopathology (1998)What Levels of Agreement Can Be Expected Between Histopathologists Assigning Cases to Discrete Nominal Categories? A Study of the Diagnosis of Hyperplastic and Adenomatous Colorectal Polyps (2000)How accurate are subjective judgements of a continuum? (2003)Validity and Reproducibility of Immunohistochemical Scoring by Trained Non-Pathologists on Tissue Microarrays (2021)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)Nominal Scale Agreement Among Observers (1986)The meaning of kappa: Probabilistic concepts of reliability and validity revisited (1996)Interobserver variation in prostate cancer Gleason scoring: Are there implications for the design of clinical trials and treatment strategies? (1997)Reducing interrater variability and improving health care: a meta‐analytical review (2011)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1956)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1994)A rEAPPRAISAL OF THE KAPPA COEFFICIENT (1988)Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1995Efforts to improve interobserver agreement in histopathological grading63 cited
  • 1994Information and observer disagreement in histopathology58 cited
  • 2001Observer accuracy in estimating proportions in images: implications for the semiquantitative assessment of staining reactions and a proposal for a new system37 cited

Cited by

  • 2018Reliability of deceased‐donor procurement kidney biopsy images uploaded in United Network for Organ Sharing8 cited
  • 2023Learning more from the inter-rater reliability of interstitial fibrosis assessment beyond just a statistic7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work