GLBT Parents’ Rights During Custody Decision Making: The Influence of Doctrine, Statute, and Societal Factors in the United States

Abstract

There are a number of legal and social factors that impact the judicial decision-making process when gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender (GLBT) parents in the United States are involved in a custody dispute. Not only are standard custody doctrines, such as the best interests and parental rights doctrines, at issue, but laws that deny marriage to gay men and lesbians, laws that govern parentage when couples use assisted reproductive technologies, and societal definitions of sex, gender, and family come into play as well, and they interact with one another in complicated ways. This research outlines and models the various ways these factors come together to create a complex legal context for nonbiological GLBT parents who are seeking custody rights to their children. Importantly, however, it also suggests that even in the face of this kind of complexity, patterned judicial responses do emerge. Specifically, judicial attention to children's best interests is consistently associated with the protection of nonbiological parent-child relationships.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 9 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.