SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Growth of Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews in Informing Dermatological Patient Care
16 references·4 citing·37 second hop
The Growth of Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews in Informing Dermatological Patient Care (2011)The Growth of Clinical Trials and Systema…Economic evaluation using decision analytical modelling: design, conduct, analysis, and reporting (2011)Economic evaluation using dec…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Report From the Institute of Medicine (2009)Comparative Effectiveness Res…Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Avoidable waste in the produc…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)How Quickly Do Systematic Rev…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences (2005)Relative Citation Impact of V…Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Contradicted and Initially St…Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons (2004)Combination of direct and ind…Large-scale randomized evidence: Large, simple trials and overviews of trials (1995)Large-scale randomized eviden…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Publication bias in clinical …Assessing the compliance of systematic review articles published in leading dermatology journals with the PRISMA statement guidelines: A systematic review (2020)Assessing the compliance of s…Quality of reporting in systematic reviews published in dermatology journals (2019)Quality of reporting in syste…Bibliometric characteristics of systematic reviews in dermatology: A cross-sectional study through Web of Science and Scopus (2015)Bibliometric characteristics …Empleo de las revisiones sistemáticas en ensayos clínicos y revisiones narrativas en dermatología: ¿se usa la mejor evidencia disponible? (2014)Empleo de las revisiones sist…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)A Nonparametric "Trim and Fill" Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (2000)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)10.1007/978-1-4899-4485-6 (2000)Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (2010)Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA (2013)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on symptoms of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2012)Response rates for CBT for anxiety disorders: Need for standardized criteria (2015)Dealing with missing standard deviation and mean values in meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: a systematic review (2018)A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2010Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,176 cited
  • 1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
  • 2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,204 cited
  • 2004Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons2,168 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,871 cited
  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 2005Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research1,465 cited
  • 2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
  • 2007How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis837 cited
  • 2009Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Report From the Institute of Medicine526 cited
  • 2005Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

497 cited
  • 1995Large-scale randomized evidence: Large, simple trials and overviews of trials365 cited
  • 2011Economic evaluation using decision analytical modelling: design, conduct, analysis, and reporting292 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2019Quality of reporting in systematic reviews published in dermatology journals23 cited
    • 2015Bibliometric characteristics of systematic reviews in dermatology: A cross-sectional study through Web of Science and Scopus21 cited
    • 2020Assessing the compliance of systematic review articles published in leading dermatology journals with the PRISMA statement guidelines: A systematic review17 cited
    • 2014Empleo de las revisiones sistemáticas en ensayos clínicos y revisiones narrativas en dermatología: ¿se usa la mejor evidencia disponible?10 cited