Dog-Whistle Politics: Multivocal Communication and Religious AppealsBethany L. Albertson2014-01-04articlePolitical Behavior207 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Religion and Society InteractionsElectoral Systems and Political ParticipationRhetoric and Communication StudiesAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 207 citations exist upstream.References2005Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses2000Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values1993Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400-14342003The Politics of Collective Violence2004Free culture: how big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity2011American grace: how religion divides and unites us2003Party Over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.2001The Race CardCited by2016Ingrouping, Outgrouping, and the Pragmatics of Peripheral Speech2022Media framing of political protests – reporting bias and the discrediting of political activism2023The Definition and Typological Model of a Dogwhistle2024The utility of (political) dogwhistles – a life cycle perspective2021Code Words2021Can we detect conditioned variation in political speech? two kinds of discussion and types of conversation