References

• 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
• 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials9,314 cited
• 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
• 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
• 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
• 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
• 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
• 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
• 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
• 2004Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement1,588 cited
• 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
• 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials1,426 cited
• 2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited