Conspiring to Mean: Experimental and Computational Evidence for a Usage-Based Harmonic Approach to Morphophonology

Abstract

This article reports on an experiment with miniature artificial languages that provides support for a synthesis of ideas from usage-based phonology (Bybee 1985, 2001, Nesset 2008) and harmonic grammar (Legendre et al. 1990, Smolensky & Legendre 2006). All miniature artificial languages presented to subjects feature velar palatalization (k → t∫ ) before a plural suffix, -i. I show that (i) examples of -i simply attaching to a [t ∫ ]-final stem help palatalization (supporting t → t∫i over t → ti and p → t∫i over p → pi), a finding that provides specific support for product-oriented schemas like ‘plurals should end in [t ∫ i]’; (ii) learners tend to perseverate on the form they know, leveling stem changes, which provides support for paradigm-uniformity constraints in favor of retaining gestures composing the known form, for example, ‘keep labiality’; and (iii) the same plural schema helps untrained singular-plural mappings more than it helps trained ones. This result is accounted for by proposing that schemas and paradigm-uniformity constraints clamor for candidate plural forms that obey them. Given that competition is between candidate outputs, the same schema provides more help to candidates that violate strong paradigm-uniformity constraints and are therefore weak relative to competitor candidates. A computational model of schema extraction is proposed.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 55 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.